Compensation, Governance, and What to Do Now: A Preparation Framework for the 2027 Maternity Coding Transition
The Preparation Window Is Open. Here's How to Use It.
The first two parts of this series explored how the 2027 maternity coding changes (part of a broader obstetric coding reform) are a structural shift that will alter how professional work across labor and delivery is attributed, measured, and compensated. Laborist financial support arrangements, employment compensation models, and professional services agreements (PSAs) are each exposed in different ways.
This final installment is about what organizations should do now. With final CPT code definitions and reimbursement guidance still forthcoming, economic modeling is premature, but preparation is not. Organizations should use the available window to build the infrastructure that discrete attribution will require, so they’re ready to act once final guidance is in hand.
This post covers four preparation areas: attribution transparency and compensation redesign, care team role alignment, documentation standards, and governance recalibration, along with a consolidated checklist of actions to take before January 1, 2027.
Attribution Transparency and Compensation Redesign
Under the global obstetric framework, maternity work is attributed in aggregate, often to the prenatal provider or attending OB, regardless of who actually managed labor or performed the delivery. Compensation models built on this aggregation operate on implicit assumptions about provider effort and contribution.
Discrete attribution changes all of that. For the first time, health systems will have a clear record of who did what across the obstetric episode. As that visibility emerges, compensation structures calibrated to the old framework will come under pressure.
Organizations that treat this as an opportunity can realign compensation with actual work, but only if structures are in place to act on that data before the transition pressure mounts.
Understand What You Have Before You Redesign
With structural change on the horizon, it pays to pause and understand the current state before moving to a redesign. In practice, many organizations lack a clear picture of how their labor and delivery professional services are currently attributed under the global framework, so building that picture first is critical.
Map your coverage model
For each labor and delivery coverage arrangement, whether laborist support agreement, employed group, or PSA, consider the following:
- Who is contractually responsible for coverage, and what does it include?
- Who is actually performing each phase of the delivery episode: triage, intrapartum management, delivery, postpartum care?
- How is professional billing currently handled for each service component, and who receives the credit?
- Where does financial support flow, in what form, and on what basis?
This exercise may surface gaps between contractual assumptions and clinical reality that the 2027 changes will make economically visible.
Quantify the attribution gap
Estimate how much inpatient obstetric professional work is performed by your laborists, employed providers, or contracted group, and how much of that work is being credited elsewhere. Even rough estimates provide a baseline for post-2027 modeling.
Why this matters now: Organizations that understand their current attribution gap before final codes are released can model impacts quickly. Those starting from scratch later will be in reactive mode.
Care Team Implications
Labor and delivery care is inherently team-based. As attribution becomes more discrete, organizations will gain greater visibility into who performs each component of care and may find that existing role definitions and compensation aren’t aligned.
Start with role clarity. Map who performs each phase of care today (triage, labor management, delivery, postpartum) across physicians, certified nurse midwives, and advanced practice providers (APPs). Where responsibilities overlap or are informal, define expectations and standardize hand-offs.
Reassess productivity and compensation. As attribution shifts, wRVU credit may move across the care team, from physicians to midlevel providers. Evaluate whether current compensation models, including pooled or shared arrangements, align with actual work performed.
Set collaborative care rules. Scenarios involving co-management and hand-offs won’t resolve themselves. Define in advance how responsibility and credit are allocated, with input from clinical and operational leadership.
Review call and coverage. Ensure responsibilities, productivity credit, and compensation remain aligned under a more transparent attribution model.
Consider downstream impact. Attribution clarity may also affect service line planning for specialties like pediatrics and neonatology, particularly in integrated women’s and children’s programs.
Establish Documentation Standards
Once care team roles and attribution rules are defined, documentation must capture and enforce them. Providers who document as they always have, without sufficient specificity, risk losing credit for work they performed.
Translate rules into workflows. Collaborate with clinical leadership, coding teams, and legal counsel to define:
- Which clinician’s documentation drives attribution for each service phase, including co-management or hand-offs
- How documentation should reflect the performing clinician, service type, setting, and timing
- Triggers for coding review versus straight-through attribution
Pilot before go-live. Test workflows through shadow coding, retrospective chart reviews, or structured walkthroughs to spot gaps between intended documentation and actual practice. Use findings to refine workflows and templates so credit is accurately captured once the new maternity codes take effect.
Governance And Model Recalibration
The 2027 maternity coding changes are expected to produce an ongoing stream of attribution data that should guide compensation decisions and coverage terms and inform hospital financial support levels. Governance structures designed for speed and flexibility can act on this data, while slow or poorly defined processes risk accumulating misalignment.
For employed groups, pressure-test your compensation committee:
- Is there a defined trigger for compensation review tied to wRVU changes, not just volume changes?
- If pooled productivity assumptions change, is there a process for recalibrating or dissolving the pool?
- Are your benchmark sources current, and do they account for how post-2027 attribution is expected to change survey data?
For laborist support agreements and PSAs, identify contracts where financial terms were set against pre-2027 attribution assumptions:
- Does the contract include a recalibration mechanism, or is it fixed-fee through a term extending past 2027?
- Is there a realistic fair market value (FMV) reassessment trigger once attribution data is available?
- Who has authority to initiate renegotiation, and is that process documented?
The question to ask now: If your laborist arrangements became misaligned with FMV tomorrow, how long would it take to detect it, decide to act, and execute an amendment?
What Organizations Should Do Now
Here’s a consolidated checklist of key preparation actions before January 1, 2027:
- Inventory coverage arrangements. Identify all laborist support agreements, OB/GYN employment arrangements, and PSAs touching labor and delivery. Note contract terms, compensation structures, and expiration or renewal dates relative to January 1, 2027.
- Diagnose attribution gaps. Map current clinical workflows against billing outcomes to see where professional work is being performed but not credited to the performing clinician. Quantify the gap where possible.
- Engage legal and valuation counsel. Assess Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute exposure across financial support arrangements. Identify arrangements that may need FMV reassessment or contract amendment.
- Define documentation and attribution standards. Convene clinical, coding, and compliance teams to establish service-level attribution rules. Document those rules formally and build them into EHR workflows and provider training before go-live.
- Test documentation workflows. Conduct shadow coding exercises or retrospective audits to validate that documentation will support intended attribution under new code definitions. Remediate gaps before implementation.
- Review compensation governance. Confirm that committee processes, including review frequency and decision-making authority, can respond to post-2027 attribution shifts within a legally appropriate timeframe.
- Monitor AMA and CMS guidance on CPT code changes for maternity care. Track final CPT code definitions, RVU assignments, and Medicare and Medicaid coverage policy releases. Assign ownership for translating guidance into organizational action as updates are published.
The Preparation Window Is Finite
Organizations that wait for complete guidance on the 2027 maternity coding changes may find the gap between “now I know exactly what’s changing” and “it’s already changed” is shorter than expected.
Preparation does not require final code definitions, but it does require organizational will and a clear-eyed assessment of where current models are most exposed.
The organizations that come out ahead of this in 2027 won’t be those that react fastest after the codes drop. They’ll be the ones that used the lead-up to get their processes and systems in place before the change hits. The seven steps outlined above are the starting point.
"The organizations that come out ahead of this in 2027 won't be those that react fastest after the codes drop. They'll be the ones that used the lead-up to get their processes and systems in place before the change hits."
If you’d like to talk through where your organization is most exposed, or how to start preparing for maternity coding changes, our team is here to help.
- Explore the Full Series: Part 1 – The Shift That Changes Everything
- See How We Support Provider Compensation Strategy
- Connect With Our Team
